Re: 2.2.10-ac10 : bad NFS performance

Benjamin LaHaise (kernel@kvack.org)
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:05:27 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Sven Heursch: "Re: SCHE_RR/FIFO"
Previous message: Riley Williams: "Re: Linux Kernel Upwards-Compatibility Deficiencies"
In reply to: Camm Maguire: "Re: IP Masquerade packet frag problem on 2.2.7"

On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Thierry Danis wrote:

> That is, 2.2.10-ac10 performs really slowly as server and client
> compared to 2.2.10-ac4 (both are running RH 6.0/knfsd 1.4.1).
>
> Any comment/explanation ?

2.2.10-ac10 has SLAB_POSIONING enabled, which fills freed memory with a
pattern to help detect misuse of freed memory. In short: it's expected.

-ben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sven Heursch: "Re: SCHE_RR/FIFO"
Previous message: Riley Williams: "Re: Linux Kernel Upwards-Compatibility Deficiencies"
In reply to: Camm Maguire: "Re: IP Masquerade packet frag problem on 2.2.7"