Re: Linux TCP/IP stack.

Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:02:34 +0200


Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Hi, in recent threads on various amiga lists, there were made some serious
> claims about Linuxes TCP/IP stack. Basically they said that it was worse
> then MSes (as far as standards complience) and that it lacked many
> important new features, such as QOS, multicast, IPv6 and such..

Good heavens. It's had all those features for a very long time. Even
IPv6 about as quickly as its specified.

> >See recent RFCs on "Known TCP implementation problems". They don't mention
> >
> > Linux there explicitly, but many of the problems listed ARE caused by
> >Linux. Miami contains special code in four places only to work around
> >known bugs in Linux and maintain interoperability.

If there are genuine bugs in Linux, Miami should be telling the TCP
implementation folks so that Linux _does_ get listed there explicitly.

Sure there might actually have been bugs in some kernel versions, which
people are still using. Linux has lots of users on the net so even when
bugs are fixed, people still use the broken kernels.

Frankly all the major stacks have a long list of known bugs in some
revisions, and everyone has code to work around other people's bugs.

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/