Re: albods

Fred Reimer (Fred.Reimer@bellsouth.net)
Thu, 8 Jul 1999 16:35:59 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [patch] 2.2.10 buffer patch"
Previous message: Rogier Wolff: "Re: Important patch to fix select!"

On Thu, 08 Jul 1999, Alexander_Maryanchick%STORACTIVE@storactive.com wrote:
> 5. As you see, in any case, some old applications will be broken.
> But if the problem will be ignored - new applications will be slow.
> (they are already too slow)
> => In any case somebody will not be happy.
>
> Personally I suggest to choose a variant with minimal compatibility affects
> ASAP.

I honestly can't believe that this is going on for so long. I don't
think applications are already too slow. What applications? I don't
see any problems with the current way of doing things.

parsing conf files is slow? Where'd anybody get that idea from. How
often do you parse conf files?

I'm just failing to see what the fuss is about. If anyone can
enlighten me I'd appreciate it...

Fred

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [patch] 2.2.10 buffer patch"
Previous message: Rogier Wolff: "Re: Important patch to fix select!"