1 <10 ms 1 ms <10 ms isexornuns.org [192.168.1.1]
2 99 ms 119 ms 109 ms ras2.admin.rocketlink.net [209.119.65.51]
3 104 ms 109 ms 109 ms 209.116.210.1
4 114 ms 110 ms 110 ms 209.116.242.5
Ping statistics for 209.116.242.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
good luck, if anyone knows about netmeeting, let me know please
thanks!
-Mark
Admin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 1999 17:29:46 -0400 (EDT), Alec Smith wrote:
>
> >I use masquerading under 2.2.x with no problems. I'm using Debian 2.1 and
> >ipchains to set things up.
> >> I just had to switch my gateway back to 2.0.36 after finding masquerading under 2.2.x extremely unreliable.
> >> What I found was:
> >> - ICMP packet loss up to 30% when pinging or doing traceroute
> >> - UDP Masquerading goin' weird when src port = dst port or src port < 1024 (couldn't figure out which of these)
> >> - 75% throughput with my ISDN line, lots of timeouts, dropped connections and the like
>
> Well what kinda hosts do You have behind your gateway? I've a DNS, which does 53:UDP -> 53:UDP, which DID NOT work at all after the first disconnect of my ISDN card. I had to put a second
> cache only DNs on my gateway to work around that...
> And just to head off comments on me using a SuSE modified kernel which came with my 6.1, I tried every kernel from 2.2.5 to 2.2.10-ac2...
>
> bye
> Mathias
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/