Re: Synchronous board drivers

Dominik Kubla (dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de)
Mon, 5 Jul 1999 09:30:42 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Dominik Kubla: "Re: Patch for 2.2.10 (Quelle surprise!)"
Previous message: Jes Sorensen: "Re: The stability crisis"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Synchronous board drivers"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: Synchronous board drivers"

On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 07:11:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Almost every "mid layer" in the kernel has proved to be a mistake in the
> long term. SCSI is the classic example
>

Alan, is that criticsm on the fundamental concept of having "mid layers"
or just on an implementation done poorly?

Dominik

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dominik Kubla: "Re: Patch for 2.2.10 (Quelle surprise!)"
Previous message: Jes Sorensen: "Re: The stability crisis"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Synchronous board drivers"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: Synchronous board drivers"