Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...)

Ralf Baechle (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
Sat, 3 Jul 1999 01:45:59 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Chip Salzenberg: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams"
Previous message: Dale Amon: "Get well soon to Hans!"

On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 01:55:39PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> > 99.9999% doesn't cut it? Damn... I'd hate to be working with you...
>
> How would you *guarantee* that availability? Btw, 99.9999% availability

Duh... Lethal undercaffeination or so ... It's of course equivalent
to about 32s downtime per year which is kinda state of the art ...

Ralf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chip Salzenberg: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams"
Previous message: Dale Amon: "Get well soon to Hans!"