> I do agree with you having having a unique string-based,
> self-descriptive device ID is a good thing, but instead of using that ID
> *instead* of the major/minor devices, why not have the kernel export a
> mapping table between the string ID and the major/minor devices to the
> user mode daemon, and then letting the user mode deamon crate the
> appropriate device files if necessary? This solves the NFS backwards
> compatibility problem, for example.
What NFS backwards compatibility problem ?
The only dev<->NFS problem that I know is, that NFS would have
problems with 16:16 and/or 32:32 major:minor numbers. And that is
not related to devfs ( well it is , but is to static /dev the same way )
-- David Balazic , student E-mail : 1stein@writeme.com | living in sLOVEnija home page: http://surf.to/stein Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT--- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/