Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Sun, 20 Jun 1999 14:37:03 -0700 (PDT)


On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Zach Brown wrote:
> > Exactly. In-kernel http is lower memory profile, simpler, and faster.
> having to change your httpd along with kernel internals is simpler? :)

This is exactly what you have to do with phhttpd right now, isnt it?

> the current khttpd with its thread/connection certainly isn't low memory
> profile either, but I'll grant Arjan that its just a matter of coding to
> fix that.

If youre going to criticize khttpd, attack the khttpd concept not the
current test code.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/