Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about

Matthew Wilcox (Matthew.Wilcox@genedata.com)
Sat, 19 Jun 1999 10:18:09 +0200


On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 07:13:40PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> khttpd is also attractive for embedded systems 8)

uhh.. why do you want an embedded system to serve static webpages?
dynamic webpages, I can understand, so it can report its status.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox <willy@bofh.ai>
"Windows and MacOS are products, contrived by engineers in the service of
specific companies. Unix, by contrast, is not so much a product as it is a
painstakingly compiled oral history of the hacker subculture." - N Stephenson

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/