Obviously, I (for one) do. I can see the need for kernel support
for NFS, but it should be limited to semantics issue (fhopen or
inodeopen seems necessary at least, maybe a few others).
unfs wasn't all that much slower than knfs and the few points where it
was it was due to the massive copying that sendfile and the new page cache
are supposed to reduce/eliminate.
The other problem was lack of threadedness, but this shouldn't be unsolvable
either.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/