Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about devfs)

Rik van Riel (riel@humbolt.nl.linux.org)
Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:06:42 +0200 (CEST)


On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

> BTW: the big issue with khttpd is a lack of genericness. Its a single
> problem single solution piece of code. There are lots and lots of
> equivalent problems and they all boil own to the same thing.

Not that I completely disagree with you, but I'm just
curious if you think the same way about knfsd...

Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ |
| Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ |
| Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/