Re: 2.2.10-ac1 doesn't build...

Richard B. Johnson (root@chaos.analogic.com)
Thu, 17 Jun 1999 08:29:33 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Alan Modra wrote:
[SNIPPED]

>
> The binutils-2.9.4 assembler has better syntax checking than previous
> versions of gas, and exposes some shoddy assembly in in2000.h
>
> This will fix it, without causing problems for old assemblers. You could
> also just zap the %%dx from the insw and outsw instructions, but this way
> we show the segment/index regs used.
>
> --- linux-2.2.10/drivers/scsi/in2000.h Sat Sep 5 20:11:10 1998
> +++ linux/drivers/scsi/in2000.h Thu Jun 17 17:20:06 1999
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
> orl %%ecx, %%ecx \n \
> jz 1f \n \
> rep \n \
> - insw %%dx \n \
> + insw (%%dx),%%es:(%%edi) \n \
> 1: " \
> : "=D" (sp) /* output */ \
> : "d" (f), "D" (sp), "c" (i) /* input */ \
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
> orl %%ecx, %%ecx \n \
> jz 1f \n \
> rep \n \
> - outsw %%dx \n \
> + outsw %%ds:(%%esi),(%%dx) \n \
> 1: " \
> : "=S" (sp) /* output */ \
> : "d" (f), "S" (sp), "c" (i) /* input */ \
>
>

But outsw and insw do not use additional oprands. DS:ESI, ES:EDI, and EDX
are implicit by the definition. Not even a segment override is possible.
Therefore these opcodes should stand alone.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
Penguin : Linux version 2.2.6 on an i686 machine (400.59 BogoMips).
Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/