Re: [RFC] Unifying kernel initialization

Horst von Brand (vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl)
Thu, 06 May 1999 09:45:57 -0400


Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> said:
> On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 08:34:29PM +0200, Paul Rusty Russell wrote:

[...]

> > Rather than a numeric priority, give it a name, a list of things that
> > must preceed it, and a list of things it must preceed. Calculate the
> > initialisation order at runtime, and then drop that whole section of
> > code and data after initialization.

> That sounds too much like second system effect to me.

True

> I think a numeric priority is fine. It would be only used in
> exceptional situations anyways, the majority of drivers don't care.

But a list of prerequisites is easy to handle during build using tsort(1),
and easier on the hackers that put the whole thing together.

-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                       mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/