Re: fork() Problem?

Raul Miller (rdm@test.legislate.com)
Wed, 5 May 1999 22:37:28 -0400

Richard B. Johnson <root@chaos.analogic.com> wrote:
> No it does not. It means, exactly what it says. It says that the
> type is that of the left operand (promotion rules) and the value
> is the value stored in the left operand after the assignment has
> taken place. It says nothing more.

Er.. but if that value is 0 then that value is 0.

> Even 'gcc' knows that the operation is incorrect, but you have to
> turn on -Wall.

Just because -Wall gives you a warning doesn't mean that the practice
violates ansi c.

If you disagree, please provide some reference to back up your point,
don't just keep repeating yourself.

-- 
Raul


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/