Re: Ken Thompson interview in IEEE Computer magazine (fwd)

Steve VanDevender (stevev@efn.org)
Tue, 4 May 1999 18:59:53 -0700 (PDT)


G. Allen Morris III writes:
> >>>Steve VanDevender said:
> > [...]
> > Linux looks a bit fragmented and chaotic makes some sense. That
> > he considers Linux to be purely a backlash against Microsoft does
> > seem to indicate he doesn't really know much about the history of
> > Linux, though.
>
> IMHO Linux was more of a backlash against AT&T and the cost of a
> UNIX license than Microsoft. Of course having MSDOS and Windows
> 3.0 to compare and contrast Linux against was a great benifit --
> I am sure.

AT&T's lawsuit that delayed the release of 4.4BSD certainly gave
Linux an opportunity to compete more seriously against free BSD
UNIX derivatives. If a BSD for Intel systems had existed sooner
then even Linus admitted that Linux would probably not exist now.

To call Linux a backlash against anything assumes that people
chose it out of spite, when in most cases people have chosen it
out of preference, certainly more so in the early days. I didn't
start running Linux because I wanted to stick it to Microsoft or
AT&T; I ran Linux because it was easily available and because I
really wanted a UNIX-like environment on a home computer.

And if you want to see where Ken Thompson's sense of esthetics
began, I highly recommend buying the now publicly-available
"Lions book", more formally titled _Lions' Commentary on UNIX 6th
Edition with Source Code_, Peer-to-Peer Communications, ISBN
1-57398-013-7.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/