Re: Mark Russinovich's reponse Was: [OT] Comments to WinNT Mag !!

Alex Buell (alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk)
Tue, 4 May 1999 22:19:16 +0100 (BST)


On Tue, 4 May 1999, Mark H. Wood wrote:

> Ugh. I liked the VMS model here. When you queue an I/O request, one
> of the things you can attach to it is the address of a procedure. When
> the request completes, the kernel creates a temporary thread to
> execute the I/O rundown code, and part of that rundown is to call the
> procedure you supplied. Your procedure would typically move something
> from a wait queue to a work queue, or flip a bit in a bitmask, or link
> a buffer onto the free chain, or whatever it takes to indicate that
> your regular thread(s) should do whatever you want done when the I/O
> has completed. When you return, the rundown thread tidies up and
> destroys itself. (Of course, if you never return, or you try to do
> huge amounts of processing in your rundown procedure, your program
> won't work very well. Don't do that. Keep it short and simple.)

SYS$QIO & its friend SYS$QIOW. Cool system calls.

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
"A mind opened by new ideas can never return to its original limits"

http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/