Re: 48 day uptime problem?
Steven Roberts (strobert@ata-sd.com)
Mon, 03 May 1999 17:15:18 -0700
Bob McElrath wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 1999, Steven Roberts wrote:
> > Which Is this known to be a 2.2 issue? I'm running 2.0.35 on an old
> > multi which has an uptime of 91 days. Only glich is netstat spewing
> > unaligned traps every now and again, but other than that, running
> > great. The machine is a user/mail/web/ftp server so it gets a fair
> > amount of network traffic.
>
> If you have an uptime of 91 days, and network stuff still works, I suppose
> that's conclusive evidince that it's in 2.2 only. Examine the patch to be
> sure though...
That is what I figured, but since I hadn't seen a statement saying 2.2
bug, figured I should let people know it looks like the breakage was in
2.2 not 2.0
Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/