> If you want I can still produce a standalone page-cache-per-inode rb-tree
> patch, but the only difference between the version just benchmarked by
> Chuck and my current RB-tree code is that now I inlined everything (maybe
> it will be a bit worse or a bit better but not a big issue also
> considering that it's common code...).
I would definitely appreciate a standalone patch. It's always best to
eliminate as many variables as possible when performance testing, and I
would frankly trust a smaller patch more. No offense, but the fewer
changes, the fewer likely introduced bugs.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/