Re: README no longer mentions symlinks for includes

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Thu, 22 Apr 1999 23:47:10 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: swoop: "Re: README no longer mentions symlinks for includes"
Previous message: Jim Zelenka: "Re: 2. I need to do block I/O, both synchronously and asynchronously."
Maybe in reply to: BROWN Nick: "README no longer mentions symlinks for includes"

On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:36:57 +0200,
BROWN Nick <Nick.BROWN@coe.fr> wrote:
>I notice that the kernel source README (in 2.2.2, anyway) no longer includes
>the warning that was in 2.0.36, that /usr/include/{asm|linux|scsi} should be
>symlinks to the kernel source tree.

If you are running glibc, /usr/include/scsi should *not* be a symlink.
glibc installs its own scsi headers.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: swoop: "Re: README no longer mentions symlinks for includes"
Previous message: Jim Zelenka: "Re: 2. I need to do block I/O, both synchronously and asynchronously."
Maybe in reply to: BROWN Nick: "README no longer mentions symlinks for includes"