> > register u_short *w = addr;
> > register int sum = 0;
> > u_short answer = 0;
> > ....
> > *(u_char*)(&answer) = *(u_char*)w;
> > sum += answer;
> > This is a dumb way to write this.
> >
> > egcs-19990405 generates code that gets the right value, others (including
> > egcs-1.0.3 used to build RedHat-5.2, AFAIKS) break, as they don't respect
> > the initialization and put a random byte in the higher half.
> >
> > A better way to write the above is just:
> >
> > sum += *(u_char*)w;
> But, isn't this a compiler bug anyway? It shouldn't ignore the initialization
> in this case - actually I wonder why it would decide to.
Yes, it is a genuine compiler bug. One that can be worked around by writing
cleaner code, in this particular case ;-)
-- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Viņa del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/