Re: Another 2.2.5 crash, and it's not X, dammit!

hellraiser (hellraiser@linuxfreak.com)
Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:08:53 -0400


are you sure you don't have any processes running that reboot the system
at a certain time?

Dan Reish wrote:
>
> This time, the system spontaneously rebooted, rather than just freezing.
> Neither of these things has _ever_ happened to me, as far as I can remember,
> while using a finished stable kernel (1.0.9, 1.2.13, 2.0.29+), so I don't
> buy the "It's probably X" argument. It's theoretically possible, but not a
> reasonable assumption with the current evidence, limited as it is. I'd
> sooner believe hardware failure, since that's happened on my system before.
>
> Once again, there was no Oops message written to /var/log/messages.
>
> I guess about the only useful information from this is that 2.2 is not yet
> as stable as it will be, and people who need it for high-availability
> applications should wait a while longer (or help fix bugs).
>
> --
> Dan
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/