KME (was Re: dilemma: /proc/kcore vs (x)kdebug.)

Tigran Aivazian (tigran@sco.COM)
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 12:44:42 +0100 (BST)


Hi,

I forgot to add that although /proc/kcore_elf is still a very good idea -
I have recently discovered another alternative that works fine under
Linux (and several other flavours of UNIX) - KME.

The URL is:

http://robertl.freeservers.com/kme/

It is a Kernel Memory Editor that allows you to browse kernel data
structures in real-time and even modify them. Supports structures (though
you need to teach it via pstruct).

Regards,
------
Tigran A. Aivazian | http://www.sco.com
Escalations Research Group | tel: +44-(0)1923-813796
Santa Cruz Operation Ltd | http://www.aivazian.demon.co.uk

On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Tigran Aivazian wrote:

> On 12 Apr 1999, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > |> Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> > |> > 3. Use what all good Linux books recommend: compile with -g and then do
> > |> > gdb vmlinux /proc/kcore.
> > |> > (does not work, try it and see).
> >
> > What's wrong with using an a.out style kcore? I haven't encountered any
> > problems yet.
>
> The only problem I encountered is mentioned in the brackets above - i.e.
> it does not work (for me, using latest versions of relevant packages).
> Indeed, try "p task[1]->comm". It will not work for aout /proc/kcore but
> works just fine for /proc/kcore_elf.
>
> Regards,
> Tigran.
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/