Re: Fun topic: name that branch!
david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
11 Apr 1999 23:07:58 -0700
In article <linux.kernel.199904120231.TAA32633@bitmover.com>,
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
>As you may or may not know, we here at BitMover are checking in all the
>tarballs into a BitKeeper repository. BitKeeper supports the concept of
>named lines of development, or releases. That means that we need nifty
>names for each of the following branches (which you can see graphically
>at http://www.bitkeeper.com/history )
>
> 0.*
Columbia
> 1.0.*
American
> 1.1.*
Mogul
> 1.2.*
Prarie
> 1.3.*
Pacific
> 2.0.*
Mikado
> 2.1.*
Hudson
> 2.2.*
Northern
____
david parsons \bi/ Spot the theme.
\/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/