Re: routing behaviour change between 2.2 and 2.0? Why?

Oleg Drokin (green@ccssu.ccssu.crimea.ua)
Sun, 11 Apr 1999 01:51:30 +0400 (MSD)


Hello!

> > 195.5.61.202 62.244.13.19 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
> > 195.5.61.202 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp1
> the most specific route wins iirc. use your ip-up script to tear down the
What do you mean with 'most specific route'?
Both are host routes (netmask 255.255.255.255). The only difference I see is that
first one redirects to a gateway and second one to device.
How the first is more specific than second?

> offending route when ppp comes up and ip-down to build it up again when ppp
> is shut down.
But in 2.0 it used to work without ip-up/down thing.

Bye,
Oleg

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/