>> Linus didn't want to accept the CVS code immediately before releasing 2.2.0,
>> and the only thing that went in to 2.2.x was a patch containing the most
>> important bug fixes.
>
>It needs people to take a stable cut from the isdn cvs tree and integrate
>it back into the tree. I've seen no evidence of the ISDN people doing that
Actually, Henner Eisen <eis@baty.hanse.de> had taken it upon himself to
feed the cvs version in (incremental but working) parts, as apparently
Linus' biggest complaint was that he would never accept the large patch
necessary for getting the 2.2.x isdn stuff up to the (stable) cvs
version in one go (hence the parts).
He sent you (Alan) a patch for the link level in the first week of
February, for inclusion in your 2.2.2ac series (at that time). It
was basically the cvs link level with the TIMRU and BUDGET extensions
taken out, as those aren't "clean" enough. I assume he's waiting to
see that appear before he's able to send the next patch.
So, Alan, have you lost / rejected / ignored that patch? I'm curious
as to the status...
Paul Slootman
-- home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl | work: paul@murphy.nl | debian: paul@debian.org http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/