Re: [patch] arca-vm-2.2.5

Chuck Lever (cel@monkey.org)
Tue, 6 Apr 1999 16:47:23 -0400 (EDT)


On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >i guess i'm confused then. what good does this change do:
>
> Hmm I think I misunderstood you point, Chuck. I thought you was
> complaining about the fact that some hash entry could be unused and other
> overloaded

yes, you understood correctly.

> but I was just assuming that the offset is always page-aligned.
> I could write a simulation to check the hash function...

i didn't realize that the "offset" argument would always be page-aligned.
but still, why does it help to add the unshifted "offset"? doesn't seem
like there's any new information in that.

- Chuck Lever

--
corporate:	<chuckl@netscape.com>
personal:	<chucklever@netscape.net> or <cel@monkey.org>

The Linux Scalability project: http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/citi-netscape/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/