> >BUt it *is* shared by the various programs in the distribution of that
> >specific package. That's not as good as using the default libc, but
> >still an improvement over static linking.
>
> Correct, however soffice binary is one app. They are not
> separate binaries anymore with 5.0. So that advantage is nil.
I'm beginning to understand why StarOffice is currently distributed in the
format it is in. Static linking of a commercial binary to LGPL'd libraries
isn't allowed.
Rats. A statically linked binary would have solved all our problems.
Cheers,
Alex
-- /_/\ Legalise cannabis now! ( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today! > ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk - *Updated* New additions in Humour section
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/