> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:46:41PM +0100, Trond Myklebust
> wrote:
>>
>> Would that be 3.2c? Is the client also under fairly heavy NFS
>> load, with high uptime?
>>
> It is Digital Unix 3.2D-1, revision 41. No, neither the client
> nor the server are under heavy load. I am collecting tcpdump
> logs. I will post them if I find something consistent.
The reason I ask is to find out whether it could be what Compaq
describe as problem MGO101612 on
http://ftp1.service.digital.com/patches/public/Digital_UNIX/v3.2d-1/duv32de1as00003-19980227.README
(It also occurs on 3.2c...)
If so, the following patch may help. I must however admit, I'd be very
surprised if it really is this bug that is causing your problem, as the
likelihood of it occurring is low unless 'jiffies' takes some very
large value...
Cheers,
Trond
--- linux-2.2.2/net/sunrpc/xprt.c Wed Jan 20 22:44:53 1999
+++ linux/net/sunrpc/xprt.c Fri Mar 12 19:43:53 1999
@@ -1206,6 +1206,8 @@
req->rq_task = task;
req->rq_xprt = xprt;
req->rq_xid = xid++;
+ if (!xid)
+ xid++;
}
/*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/