Re: dual pentium

Vladimir Dergachev (vdergach@sas.upenn.edu)
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 12:27:05 -0500 (EST)


On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Alec Smith wrote:

> And you can count on SMP being improved as the versions go on. Scalability
> is a goal for the continuing development of Linux. Therefore, getting a
> dual pentium isn't a bad investment.
>
This argument has a drawback that when things do improve your board may
not actually be able to use them. And the same board will cost a lot less
at the time you'll be able to use the improvements.

On the other hand two processors are a good thing to have - and a lot of
people are using dual cpu systems right now.

Vladimir Dergachev

>
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > the idea now is to get a dual processor pentium.
> >
> > Dual pentium or dual PII - a dual pentium is junk nowdays
> >
> > > my question is this - how well supported is this under linux?
> > > is it stable? and also does the kernel make any effort to
> > > parallelize across both processors or does it just multi-task across
> > > them?
> >
> > It balances processes across them. In 2.2 it also runs some kernel work
> > spread across both processors
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/