Re: Kernel 2.2.1 and sysvinit 2.76 possible bug

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:44:58 +0000 (GMT)


> I see. So tanking the whole unit is better. That way, if no one is

If there is no init your machine is dead. How can the kernel reparent a
task to a task that doesnt exist for example.

> flexibility as to how to proceed in this dire situation (ie. an opportunity
> to carry out some other task perhaps, before cycling). I would suggest
> that the behavior on loss of init be a toggleable /proc/sys/kernel switch.

Pick. Oops crash maybe reboot v Reboot

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/