Re: Framebuffer bug

Navindra Umanee (navindra@cs.mcgill.ca)
Sun, 7 Feb 1999 17:48:11 -0500


Montreal Sun Feb 7 17:45:29 1999

Arvind Sankar <arvinds@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 04:42:38PM -0500, Navindra Umanee wrote:
> > Montreal Sun Feb 7 16:38:41 1999
> >
> > Arvind Sankar <arvinds@mit.edu> wrote:
> > > this is deep. What does X say while starting up? Are there any errors?
> >
> > No, X behaves normally. Here are the numbers:
> >
> > Without ATY:
> >
> > Text: 31.5kHz @71Hz
> > X : 56.6kHz @71Hz
> >
> > With ATY:
> >
> > Text: 31.4kHz @60Hz (configurable with fbset)
> > X : 47.2kHz @59Hz
>
> with my modified atyfb, I get 84.8 Hz vertical, and in X, the same 71.5Hz.
> No problems. The unmodified aty is set to do 60Hz vertical by default, but
> it shouldnt matter to X.

Well, with a modified version of your patch, I get a nice 1024x768 at
56.4kHz@70Hz at the console but X comes up at 50.0kHz@63Hz.

> what's ur kernel? mine is 2.2.1.

Same.

-N.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/