Re: RH 5.1 and Kernel 2.2.1
Harald Dunkel (harri@Synopsys.COM)
Thu, 04 Feb 1999 18:37:52 +0100
"Shaw, Mark" wrote:
>
> Yikes! Apparently, trying to run 2.2.1 on top of a RH 5.1 distribution is a
> really bad idea, especially with the "kernel modules 2.1.121 requirement."
> I tried this and let's just say, this machine is hosed. Luckily, this is
> just one node in a multi-node PVM cluster :-)
>
> Has anyone successfully done this? Should I get a copy of 5.2 and try it
> again? I have been running 2.1.130 on RH 5.1 for a while with zero
> problems. I'll wait a while before rebuilding this box with 5.1.
>
With Slink and Potato Debian I had no problems so far. IMHO the debian
package scheme works better than RPM, too. You should give it a try.
Regards
Harri
--
Harald Dunkel | dunkel@Synopsys.COM | O glücklich, wer noch hoffen kann,
Synopsys GmbH | Kaiserstr. 100 | aus diesem Meer des Irrtums
52134 Herzogenrath, Germany | aufzutauchen. Faust,
+49 2407 9558 (fax? 44: 0) | Der Tragödie erster Teil, J.W.G.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/