Re: RMS at it again *sigh*

Chris Wedgwood (cw@ix.net.nz)
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 10:34:57 +1300


On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 04:08:32PM +0100, Roger Espel Llima wrote:

> Re-read the article, he explicitly says that for libraries like
> glibc the LGPL makes sense. He's arguing for GPL for "special
> utility" libraries like readline or GMP (which are both under GPL
> already, AFAIK).

GMP is LGPL -- not GPLd

-cw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/