sorry for the delay, I've been on business tour for three days.
Really a good question ! I have no idea (yet).
I will cross-check this on monday on my ISDN-firewall-gateway.
Frank
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Brian Schau wrote:
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:37:38 +0100
> From: Brian Schau <bsc@fleggaard.dk>
> To: frankb@ipf.de
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, gerd@cacafonix.harz.de
> Subject: Re: ISDN & 2.2.0 - the saga continues (WAS: 2.2.0: performance &isdn)
>
> Hi Frank
>
>
> It might be so. But why does the ping 'die' ...?
>
> > > bsc@cryo:~ > ping 192.168.33.1
> > > PING 192.168.33.1 (192.168.33.1): 56 data bytes
> > > 64 bytes from 192.168.33.1 icmp_seq=0 ttl=62 time=1413.5 ms
> > > 64 bytes from 192.168.33.1 icmp_seq=1 ttl=62 time=427.1 ms
> > > ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
> > > ping: wrote 192.168.33.1 64 chars, ret=-1
>
>
> --
> Automobile, n.:
>
> A four-wheeled vehicle that runs
> up hills and down pedestrains.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/