> > I think rolling it all into one large patch would be a bad thing, who's
> > going to oversee integration? Linus. woudl you want to stare at upwards
> > of 1 megs of diffs spread across 5 revisions?
>
> Nope, that would be torture for Linus... At least unless they were neatly
> explained and separated into categories & non-interdependant.
OK, agreed. This was a little brainfart on my side. OTOH, all
the new code does need to be tested up-front. Preferably before
2.3 is branched...
> And I think that Linus need to participate to stop the meaningless
> ideas. After all, if the ideas doesn't pass Linus, it won't get
> into the kernel in the first place anyway...
I don't think Linus has time for that. Besides, most subsystem
people will know how to handle that as well -- in most cases,
Linus shouldn't have to be present in order to have bad ideas
taken down...
regards,
Rik -- If a Microsoft product fails, who do you sue?
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. riel@nl.linux.org |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.nl.linux.org/~riel |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/