Re: 2.2.0 SECURITY

Robert B. Hamilton (rbh041a@unix.tamu.edu)
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 01:08:44 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jim Woodward: "Re: 2.2.0 SECURITY"
Previous message: David Lang: "Re: 2.2.0 SECURITY"
In reply to: Anthony Barbachan: "Re: Finally the 2.2.0 is out of sight :-)."
Next in thread: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: Finally the 2.2.0 is out of sight :-)."

On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Richard Gooch wrote:

>
> I've got 1.9.9. That's the solution: upgrade to libc 5.

Same here (well, 1.9.6) and libc 5, and I can't break my
machine this way either.
-- Robert

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jim Woodward: "Re: 2.2.0 SECURITY"
Previous message: David Lang: "Re: 2.2.0 SECURITY"
In reply to: Anthony Barbachan: "Re: Finally the 2.2.0 is out of sight :-)."
Next in thread: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: Finally the 2.2.0 is out of sight :-)."