Re: /proc/version obsolete?

david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
26 Jan 1999 16:10:06 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Augusto Cesar: "problems in remove_from_queues() (fs/buffer.c) part 2"
Previous message: Simon Kirby: "[Hopefully closed] Re: Socket destroy delayed messages under pre8"
Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "/proc/version obsolete?"

In article <linux.kernel.199901262211.QAA16030@mango.pointofchoice.com>,
Pete Harlan <harlan@pointofchoice.com> wrote:
>> Why do we need /proc/version if we have that info in
>> /proc/sys/kernel/version already?
>
>To maintain backwards compatibility with david parsons.

I suspect I'm not the only person who cares about backwards
compatability.

____
david parsons \bi/ 700k for a 2.2pre9 kernel? Eeek!
\/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Augusto Cesar: "problems in remove_from_queues() (fs/buffer.c) part 2"
Previous message: Simon Kirby: "[Hopefully closed] Re: Socket destroy delayed messages under pre8"
Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "/proc/version obsolete?"