Re: arca-vm-8 [Re: [patch] arca-vm-6, killed kswapd [Re: [patch] new-vm , improvement , [Re: 2.2.0 B

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Wed, 6 Jan 1999 15:35:01 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Greg Wickham: "Does 2.1.132<->2.1.132 + packet loss = stuck tcp?"
Previous message: C S Hendrix: "Re: sb live"
Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: arca-vm-8 [Re: [patch] arca-vm-6, killed kswapd [Re: [patch] new-vm , improvement , [Re: 2.2.0 B"
Reply: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: arca-vm-8 [Re: [patch] arca-vm-6, killed kswapd [Re: [patch] new-vm , improvement , [Re: 2.2.0 B"

Oh, well.. Based on what the arca-[678] patches did, there's now a pre-5
out there. Not very similar, but it should incorporate the basic idea:
namely much more aggressively asynchronous swap-outs from a process
context.

Comment away,

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg Wickham: "Does 2.1.132<->2.1.132 + packet loss = stuck tcp?"
Previous message: C S Hendrix: "Re: sb live"
Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: arca-vm-8 [Re: [patch] arca-vm-6, killed kswapd [Re: [patch] new-vm , improvement , [Re: 2.2.0 B"
Reply: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: arca-vm-8 [Re: [patch] arca-vm-6, killed kswapd [Re: [patch] new-vm , improvement , [Re: 2.2.0 B"