Re: 2.2.0-pre1-ac4: unresolved symbol unix98_max_ptys

David Weinehall (tao@acc.umu.se)
Wed, 6 Jan 1999 01:33:17 +0100 (MET)


On 4 Jan 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Followup to: <368F7DCC.697F5344@student.anu.edu.au>
> By author: Martijn van Oosterhout <v3100411@student.anu.edu.au>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
[snip]

> 1. Don't compile Unix98 as a module (although it should work, it is a
> highly discouraged configuration -- the modular option is mainly for
> testing, as the modularity overhead is significant.)

Then, would it be possible to mark only the modular code [experimental]
with some kind of configure/menuconfig/xconfig hack?! That is, if you
enable [experimental], it'd show < >, else [ ]....

/David Weinehall
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/