> Is this really necessary?
>
> I've always found UNFSD quite good and featureful, and I find the way it
> resolves permissions based on path names very useful. (A feature KNFSD
> does not have).
>
> I thought the only downside to UNFSD was it's lack of threading, making
> it slow for heavy use. A clone based version would fix this, no?
I was horrified when I found out that our pentium/100 server with 5
scsi disks gives only 300K/sec with unfsd.... :-(.
Pavel
PS: I like unfsd for other purposes: Like making file ungzipping
transparent :-).
-- The best software in life is free (not shareware)! Pavel GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/