Re: Linux 2.2.0pre2

Andi Kleen (ak@muc.de)
31 Dec 1998 18:20:09 +0100


In article <Pine.LNX.3.95.981230231437.442A-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>,
torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) writes:
> - fix for an attack where you could cause a complete and utter lockup of
> the kernel as a normal user. Thanks to Michael Chastain for keeping the
> faith on this one and reminding me to fix it.

This is harmless compared to the attacks possible with /proc/<pid>/mem @)
All functions in fs/proc/mem.c are super-racy (the process/mm structure may
go away while it sleeps) and have other problems. Also they are completely
unreliable to use because they don't fault in pages. Alan's acX patches
have a patch that fix most races, except a few problems in the mem_mmap()
range checking. Fixing mmap completely is hard because doing it full may
lead to shared anonymous mappings.

These problems are in 2.0 too.

> If you haven't had problems with pre1, there should be no major cause to
> look at pre2. But if you haven't even looked at pre1 yet, please consider
> looking at the pre-2.2.0 kernels before it's too late. I'm going to be
> extremely rude to people who knew better but didn't test out the pre-
> kernels and then send me bug-reports on the released 2.2.0.

Out of memory handling seems to be poor in 2.2.0pre1. It gets into a strange
swap storm that does not do full HD bandwidth swapping, but small bursts of
IO with pauses.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/