Re: 2.1.132 Patch
Lenart Gabor (lgb@hal2000.hal.vein.hu)
Mon, 28 Dec 1998 09:00:21 +0100
On Wed, Dec 23, 1998 at 01:44:02PM +0000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> >
> > If you were previously running a UP .131, you need to uncomment the line
> > about SMP=1 in the Makefile before attempting to patch your tree. This is
> > because .132 includes the config option for SMP and therefore patches that
> > area of the Makefile, causing the patch to fail if it is not the same.
> > On Tue, 22 Dec 1998 rdicaire@vic.com wrote:
> >
> > > Is it just me or has anyone noticed that the 2.1.132 patch, when applied,
> > > still shows kernel version as 2.1.131, and that the background title in
> > > make menuconfig also shows 2.1.131?
>
> Well, somethins WAS strange. I untarred a fresh 2.1.130, applied .131
> and .132 and
> did the build (running .131 UP at the time).
>
> On bootup some errors flashed by about 'msdos' being the wrong version
> (2.1.131)
> but when a manual 'modprobe msdos' worked just fine. There was maybe
> 5-10 messages
> and they went by too fast to read.
I've got similar problem, because I has used 2.1.131 UP (so SMP=1
was marked out with '#') and patch couldn't patch Makefile because
of this change. Restore Makefile to the 'official' state or patch
Makefile by hand (I hope I'm right : you might want to change 131 to
132 and remove SMP=... and remarks before it, see the patch)
---[ LGB/DC ]------------[ University Of Veszprém ]------[ Lénárt Gábor ]---
"The truth is out there" "We're l{ea,i}ving together" "The future is dark."
---[ 88/422022(4602) ]---[ http://lgb.hal.vein.hu ]---------[ 87/477074 ]---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/