> Hello,
>
> > Bus 0, device 19, function 0:
> > Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq Unknown device (rev 4).
> > Vendor id=1274. Device id=1371.
> > Slow devsel. IRQ 13. Master Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=12.Max Lat=128.
> > I/O at 0xef00 [0xef01].
> >
> > 00:13.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq: Unknown device 1371 (rev 04)
> > Subsystem: Unknown device 1274:1371
> > Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
> > Status: 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=slow >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> > Latency: 12 min, 128 max, 64 set
> > Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 19
> > Region 0: I/O ports at ef00
> >
> > You'll see that /proc/pci claims this sound card is device 19 and using
> > IRQ 13, whereas /proc/bus/pci sees it as device 13 using IRQ 19.
> > /proc/interrupts indicates that /proc/bus/pci is correct.
>
> 19 dec == 13 hex :-)
Hmmm ... I am not sure that a smiley was appropriate in your reply.
AFAIR, until somebody, you hopefully know very well, changed the PCI code,
IRQ numbers were correctly reported in _decimal_ by pci.c.
You should fix immediately oldproc.c rather than smiling at the face of
17% of the OS market that probably expects 2.2 kernels to provide
compatibibility with applications based on 2.0 kernels, IMO. :-))
Happy New Year!
Regards,
Gerard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/