2.1.132 Patch

rdicaire@vic.com
Tue, 22 Dec 1998 21:12:35 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eric Lee Green: "Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"
Previous message: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"
Next in thread: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"
Maybe reply: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"
Maybe reply: menion: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"
Maybe reply: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"
Maybe reply: Michael Elizabeth Chastain: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"

Is it just me or has anyone noticed that the 2.1.132 patch, when applied,
still shows kernel version as 2.1.131, and that the background title in
make menuconfig also shows 2.1.131?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eric Lee Green: "Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"
Previous message: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"
Next in thread: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"
Maybe reply: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"
Maybe reply: menion: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"
Maybe reply: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"
Maybe reply: Michael Elizabeth Chastain: "Re: 2.1.132 Patch"