2.1.* -> 2.0.* network call translation

Peter T. Breuer (ptb@it.uc3m.es)
Sun, 20 Dec 1998 17:26:54 +0100 (MET)

Can someone tell me if the following 2.1 -> 2.0 translations are
(approximately) correct or if there is something more appropriate
to use in 2.0.*.

2.1.* sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg, size );
2.0.* sock->ops->sendmsg(sock, &msg, size, 0, 0);

2.1.* sock_recvmsg(sock, &msg, size, 0 );
2.0.* sock->ops->recvmsg(sock, &msg, size, 0, 0, 0 );

(it seems to work up to a point)

Peter

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/