Re: 2.1.131: some quality thoughts

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 17 Dec 1998 14:03:43 +0000 (GMT)

> I know that it's ugly, but could "core" be renamed before 2.2 comes
> out? Possible candidated might be "netcore", "kern[el]", "nucleus",
> "base". A symbolic link could be added to tar archives to support the
> old name if necessary.

Why

CVS can handle "core" just fine. In fact a cvs that ignores directories
not files called core by default is just plain broken.

DaveM has been keeping the tree in CVS for a long time without problems,
with remote cvs access and all the works

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/