> > Doing this means there is little point having a quiet mode -- because
> > the copyright cruft is a good part of the message on some systems
> > (unless you have lots of SCSI drives).
> >
> > Are we legally required to keep the copyright messages on boot? I
> > thought this would be considered a `restriction' ?
>
> Legally required - I dont think so. Polite - yes
As a counterexample, I'd like to point out that the various BSDs
contain plenty of individually copyrighted kernel code (Justin Gibbs'
CAM code in FreeBSD, for instance), yet they don't spam the user with
a lot of copyright messages on boot. They would in fact consider it
tacky to do so.
-- Mirian Crzig Lennox Systems Anarchist "There's a New World Order coming every minute. Make mine extra cheese."- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/