Re: 960MB limitation for 2.2 ?

MOLNAR Ingo (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Sat, 5 Dec 1998 14:01:04 +0100 (CET)


On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Chris Evans wrote:

> Removing it seems silly. If users can't be trusted to get it right then
> don't expose the settable option through the "make config" "make
> menuconfig" etc. interfaces. But by all means leave the #define (heavily
> commented of course) in a Makefile or include somewhere.

actually, there was one more ugliness too: i was unable to pass parameters
to the ld script properly, so ended up passing it via a temporary file ...
(the 2.0 patch doesnt have this problem since we do not use lds scripts
there.)

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/