Re: Y2k compliance

robbie@scot-mur.demon.co.uk
Fri, 4 Dec 1998 01:03:30 +0000


On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 10:30:44AM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 11:53:57AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> >
> > > Linux ignores the RTC century byte (for good reason). Before I put
> > > this fix in, when the year wrapped to 00 Linux would read the RTC
> > > year as 1900. So a reboot (who does that anyway?) would give a
> > > classic Y2K time warp.
> >
> > So how does it know what century it is?
>
> If the right part of the year is less then z it's 20xx if it's greater
> it's 19xx
So how does it cope with 2000 being a leep year? In the small ammount of
experimenting I have done, the year goes back to 1980, not 1900. I think
linux needs some way of dealing with these buggy machines, probably in
user space.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 

Robbie Murray

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/