>I think it's a bit of an overkill as it is now, but if you
>include checks for _all_ processors it might make for a
>pretty decent SMP reschedule_idle.
My point is not only SMP, it' s that doing that we call schedule() only
when we are sure that next will be != than prev.
Andrea Arcangeli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/